Knowledge base https://wiki.apstrom.ca/ 2026-05-19T06:14:22+00:00 https://wiki.apstrom.ca/ https://wiki.apstrom.ca/_media/wiki:dokuwiki.svg text/html 2023-04-24T18:39:57+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.apstrom.ca/firm_resources:procedure:actions?rev=1682361597&do=diff Actions text/html 2023-04-24T18:30:08+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.apstrom.ca/firm_resources:procedure:appeals?rev=1682361008&do=diff Appeals text/html 2023-11-09T20:34:58+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.apstrom.ca/firm_resources:procedure:court-contact?rev=1699562098&do=diff Superior Court Contacts This page provides contact information for Superior Court (a.k.a. Court of King's Bench) jurisdictions throughout Canada with which we are likely to enter into contact. Courts of appeal are considered to be King's Bench jurisdiction, even though they are constituted by statute and thus not of inherent jurisdiction. text/html 2023-10-14T20:44:31+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.apstrom.ca/firm_resources:procedure:default?rev=1697316271&do=diff Default in civil proceedings The act of noting default (or of default, if one is a defendant) may quickly bring proceedings to a close. This procedure is useful when a defendant, who has been properly served, fails to file a defence within a prescribed timeline. In such circumstances, the defendant may be noted in default, thus absolving the plaintiff of establishing the cause of action. text/html 2023-12-21T16:44:33+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.apstrom.ca/firm_resources:procedure:motions?rev=1703177073&do=diff Motions This page contains details regarding the preparation and scheduling of motions of various types in the various judicial districts in which we practice. When preparing motions, be sure to check the practice guides in the judicial district in which the motion is to be heard. The county law associations typically post such guides, along with the courts' practice directions, on their websites. text/html 2024-02-20T14:33:38+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.apstrom.ca/firm_resources:procedure:orders?rev=1708439618&do=diff Orders In a superior court A court-ordered timetable may be peremptory, but a peremptory order “must be clearly peremptory”—the parties cannot read the requirement to obey every aspect of an order into the order absent clear text (2019 ONSC 2348, text/html 2023-04-19T02:53:09+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.apstrom.ca/firm_resources:procedure:sedona?rev=1681872789&do=diff Sedona principles The Sedona Canada Principles Addressing Electronic Discovery create a series of guidlines, with extensive annotation, for the discovery of electronic content. These principles are the product of the Sedona working group on e-discovery, which has been revising the principles since 2008. These principles are updated as new technologies and types of data are introduced. The working group's focus is, as the title of its principles suggests, electronic discovery. text/html 2024-02-20T14:36:22+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.apstrom.ca/firm_resources:procedure:timetables?rev=1708439782&do=diff Timetables Litigation timetables can be extraordinarily lengthy. The general presumption is that any delay is prejudicial to clients' interest and to the proper function of the judicial system. As a firm, therefore, we strive to obtain tight timetables and execute them as written. Our interactions with opposing counsel must go to this point: we do not brook delay without a reasonable justification.