Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| firm:drafting:legal-instruments [2024/08/07 20:56] – adam | firm:drafting:legal-instruments [2025/09/29 17:21] (current) – admin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| " | " | ||
| - | ==== Drafting | + | ===== Drafting |
| + | ==== Definitions ==== | ||
| + | Definitions are used sparingly to avoid altering the common meaning of words or phrases used in a contract. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This rule cuts against the grain of typical contract drafting but accords with the principles of legislative drafting. A typical contract will include extraneous and wholly unnecessary definitions that either provide the common meaning of words or phrases or define words and phrases that refer to the subject of the agreement. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The purpose of a definition is set out by the Uniform Law Conference of Canada in its //Drafting Conventions//: | ||
| + | |||
| + | '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | These guidelines apply as much to contract drafting as to legislative drafting. They limit the use of definitions to cases of clear ambiguity or altering the common meaning of a word or phrase such that it bears a meaning specific to the contract. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Definitions are located in either a general or specific definitions section. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A general definitions section appears in Part I, section 1 of the contract. This section will set out any definition that applies to the entire agreement or that may affect the entire agreement. | ||
| + | * Specific definitions are appear as interpretation sections that begin parts of the contract or as sub-sections in sections. These definitions will, as their name suggests, relate only to parts or sections of the agreement. | ||
| + | * The decision to create specific definitions may be made when a limited part of the contract requires a departure from a word or phrase' | ||
| ===== Common clauses ===== | ===== Common clauses ===== | ||
| Line 61: | Line 85: | ||
| The following lines will be unnumbered and will detail definitions using the following phrase: | The following lines will be unnumbered and will detail definitions using the following phrase: | ||
| - | ''" | + | ''" |
| the definition of the word or phrase is then provided. | the definition of the word or phrase is then provided. | ||
| - | Interpretation sections should only include terms that are being used in a technical or peculiar sense that requires definition. | + | Interpretation sections should only include terms that are being used in a technical or peculiar sense that requires definition. The tendency to define every term is not useful and only distracts from the substance of the agreement. |
| + | |||
| + | A further, quite useful, interpretation provision arises when a statute controls the subject matter of the contract. This case often arises when dealing with corporations and, in such cases, the status already supercedes the contract--there is no point in fighting it. Instead of defining terms that may otherwise be defined in the statute, a clause may simply read: | ||
| + | |||
| + | '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | This provision will cause all the definitions from the referenced section to become incorporated by reference in the agreement. A drafter should take care not to unwittingly incorporate definitions that are at odds with the intended meaning of a word or phrase in the agreement. Blanket incorporation by reference must only be used when the drafter has reviewed the definitions and made sure that the agreement and statute properly use each defined term. | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
