Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| firm:law:court-procedure:experts [2024/11/08 16:06] – 192.168.134.1 | firm:law:court-procedure:experts [2025/03/11 19:54] (current) – 192.168.134.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| - The expert’s reasons for his or her opinion, including, (i) a description of the factual assumptions on which the opinion is based; (ii) a description of any research conducted by the expert that led him or her to form the opinion; and (iii) a list of every document, if any, relied on by the expert in forming the opinion. | - The expert’s reasons for his or her opinion, including, (i) a description of the factual assumptions on which the opinion is based; (ii) a description of any research conducted by the expert that led him or her to form the opinion; and (iii) a list of every document, if any, relied on by the expert in forming the opinion. | ||
| - A statement signed by the expert certifying that the expert is satisfied as to the authenticity of every authority or other document or record referred to in the report, other than, (i) a document or record consisting of evidence or potential evidence in the action that the expert analysed or interpreted in the report, if the document or record was provided to the expert by or on behalf of the party intending to call the expert as a witness; (ii) an authority or other document or record cited by the expert in the report only because it was referenced in a report prepared by another expert witness in the action and the expert is commenting on the reference; and (iii) an authority or other document or record referred to in the report the authenticity of which the expert doubts. | - A statement signed by the expert certifying that the expert is satisfied as to the authenticity of every authority or other document or record referred to in the report, other than, (i) a document or record consisting of evidence or potential evidence in the action that the expert analysed or interpreted in the report, if the document or record was provided to the expert by or on behalf of the party intending to call the expert as a witness; (ii) an authority or other document or record cited by the expert in the report only because it was referenced in a report prepared by another expert witness in the action and the expert is commenting on the reference; and (iii) an authority or other document or record referred to in the report the authenticity of which the expert doubts. | ||
| - | - Details of the doubts the expert has respecting the authenticity of an authority, document or record described in subparagraph 6.1 iii, and of any doubts the expert may have respecting the authenticity of an authority, document or record described in subparagraph 6.1 i or ii. | + | - Details of the doubts the expert has respecting the authenticity of an authority, document or record described in 7 (iii), and of any doubts the expert may have respecting the authenticity of an authority, document or record described in item 7 (i) or (ii). |
| - | - An acknowledgement of expert’s duty (Form 53) signed | + | - An acknowledgement of expert’s duty signed by the expert. |
| + | |||
| + | For the purposes of an expert report, the following presumption regarding documents applies: | ||
| + | |||
| + | '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Expert' | ||
| + | |||
| + | A duty of care is incumbent on all medical professionals toward patients in their care. This duty of care is well-established. It is, generally, to " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Template expert briefs ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * {{ : | ||
| + | * {{ : | ||
